In Attis v. Canada (Minister of Health) (2005), 75 O.R. (3d) (S.C.J.), Winkler J. considered certain applications in the context of an intended class proceeding against Canada. The issue arose in the context of a case conference dealing with a scheduling motion. The defendant and third party objected to the scheduling of the certification motion, seeking that the third party’s intended motion to strike the third party notice be scheduled and decided in advance of the certification motion.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.