The following excerpt is from Brewery Employers Industrial Relations Association v. Western Union of Brewery, Beverage, Winery and Distillery Workers, Local 287, 1989 ABCA 305 (CanLII):
Counsel for the respondent contends, incorrectly, that in reaching his conclusion the arbitrator misconstrued guideline 3.8 of the regulations. He argues on the basis of McLeod v. Egan, (1974) 1974 CanLII 12 (SCC), 46 D.L.R. (3d) 150 (S.C.C.) that judicial deference will not extend to an arbitrator who makes a mistake in interpreting a statute or general law. This principle cannot be disputed, but it has no application in this case because no such mistake is shown.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.