This application is similar to Florek v. Appleton (2001), 284 A.R. 366, 2001 ABQB 127. That application arose out of a low speed collision. I found that there were a number of factors such as longstanding, pre‑existing injuries; conflict among experts; and the fact that collision reconstruction and that bio‑mechanics reports were necessary. Taken alone each of the factors may not have been detrimental to the application, but cumulatively they made the trial of the action too inconvenient to be heard by a jury.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.