Can an employer require an employee to work 75 hours in the month of June to qualify for an annual allowance?

Canada (Federal), Canada

The following excerpt is from Public Service Alliance of Canada v. Treasury Board (Canada Border Services Agency), 2018 FPSLREB 82 (CanLII):

32 Paragraph 35 of Brisson v. Canadian Food Inspection Agency,2005 PSLRB 38, states as follows: “The adjudicator, when dealing with a clear clause, cannot add terms that might have the effect of expanding or diminishing the clause’s scope.” The grievor stated that to read Appendix J in the manner suggested by the employer, which is that to earn the annual allowance for the month of June 2013, an employee must have worked 75 hours between June 21 and 30, 2013, would in effect add terms that would either expand or diminish the scope of Appendix J.

Other Questions


Does Section 6672 of the Federal Tax Code require an employer to withhold withholding from an employee, even if the employer pays withholding taxes to the employee? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a collective agreement allow an employer to impose daily changes to normal schedules hours of work by the employer with 12–days notice? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is an employee required to obtain an employment authorization to engage and continue in employment in Canada? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does an employer need to make clear to employees that the employer will have the final determination of employee benefits decisions? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is an employer required to be aware of an employee's need for accommodation prior to the employer's consideration? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can an employer refuse to reemploy an employee on the basis that another employee was hired to fill the position during the employee's absence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is an employer required to pay overtime for hours worked beyond forty hours per week? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is the panel’s decision that a Minister of Justice should not be allowed to appoint a Minister for Employment and Immigration (e.g. Minister of Work and Pensions) to the Minister of Employment and Training (Employment), or is the panel's decision patently unreasonable? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does the difference between the employer and the employee when it comes to determining whether the advantage accrued primarily to the employer or the worker? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is municipal liability premised on a municipality's failure to properly train its employees to be qualified for employment? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.