The Crown contends that R v. Stillman, 1997 CanLII 384 (SCC), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 607 defines the appropriate standard of review for a s. 24(2) Charter analysis at para. 68: It has been held that appellate courts should only intervene with respect to a lower court's s. 24(2) analysis when that court has made "some apparent error as to the applicable principles or rules of law" or has made an unreasonable finding
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.