What is the obligation of a claimant to prove that antagonism was a factor in their decision to leave their employment?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from C. M. v Canada Employment Insurance Commission, 2018 SST 354 (CanLII):
When a claimant is citing antagonism as a reason for leaving their employment, the obligation is on the claimant to show that the situation occurs independently from the will or participation of the claimant and is beyond their control (Smith v. Canada (Attorney General) A-875-96).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is the panel’s decision that a Minister of Justice should not be allowed to appoint a Minister for Employment and Immigration (e.g. Minister of Work and Pensions) to the Minister of Employment and Training (Employment), or is the panel's decision patently unreasonable? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the obligation of a claimant to establish that all or part of the sums received as a result of his employment from employment were not earnings? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a claimant voluntarily leaves her employment? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the burden of production for an employer to prove its own reasons for adverse employment decisions? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a claimant be disqualified from receiving employment insurance benefits if they lost their employment because of their misconduct? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does an employer need to make clear to employees that the employer will have the final determination of employee benefits decisions? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving that an employer's reason was a pretext for discrimination in an employment action? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving a previous employer discriminated against applicants who reapply for employment? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the initial burden of proving that protected conduct was a substantial or motivating factor in a prison officials' disciplinary decision? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a Minister of Employment and Immigration have to be held responsible for the Employment Minister’s employment policy? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
