Is a plaintiff entitled to a claim for funds for future care?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Madge v. Meyer, 1999 ABQB 1017 (CanLII):
Andrews v. Grand & Toy, supra, stands for the principle that money for future care is to provide for physical arrangements, assistance, and equipment and facilities directly related to the plaintiff's injuries. Further, wives and mothers are not expected to provide their services for free.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the damages for loss of income, cost of future care, cost-of-future care, and loss of earning capacity? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to a strike out of his statement of claim on the grounds of immunity? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the effect of a prayer for relief that includes a claim for housekeeping assistance as part of the cost of future care? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to claim damages for items that have not been claimed? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff is entitled to damages from an event that may happen in the future? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will the real beneficiaries of a tortfeasor's claim be entitled to sue the real plaintiff? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of care for damages for cost of future care? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a plaintiff amend his Statement of Claim to add a defendant to his Claim? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to claim damages for failing to recognize that he has been deprived of enjoyment of life as he knew it before the accident? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to a strike out his statement of claim on the grounds of immunity? (Alberta, Canada)
