Similarly, Martin J. said at pp. 742-43: ".… the fact that he has not now the capacity to realize that he has been deprived of enjoyment of life, as he knew it before the accident, as a result of the injuries he suffered for which he is entitled to be compensated, just as, in England, the non-recognition of or indifference to a plaintiff's loss of expectancy of life was held not to disentitle him to recover under that head of damages (Roach v. Yates [supra])."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.