What is the standard of judicial review of an administrative decision?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Vancouver Rape Relief Society v. Nixon et al., 2003 BCSC 1936 (CanLII):
All counsel agreed there are now three standards of judicial review of administrative decisions: “correctness”, “reasonableness simpliciter” and “patent unreasonableness” in light of the decision in Law Society of New Brunswick v. Ryan 2003 SCC 20 (“Ryan”).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the standards of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision made under the Rules of Review Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review on a judicial review of a decision of the Superintendent to uphold an IRP? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a judicial review of a decision of an adjudicator confirming a roadside driving prohibition? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a judicial review decision by a chambers judge who failed to take the necessary steps to review a decision by the chambers judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a decision by an administrative decision maker? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the standard of review apply to a review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal decision to which the decision was patently unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard for judicial review of an administrative decision? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the judicial review approach used by a court engaged in judicial review? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness standard in the context of a judicial review of an administrative driving prohibition? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an application for judicial review of a statutory tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)
