A need for a second defence medical may be justified where there is an unexpected change in the plaintiff’s complaints, symptoms or circumstances. A further defence medical will not be permitted where the recent disclosure is more a continuation of what was known rather than an unexpected change in complaints, symptoms or circumstances: Fromm v. Rajani, [2009] O.J. No. 3671 (S.C.J.) at paras. 13, 16.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.