A party who dictates different terms for a contract already formed can be considered to be refusing to perform the contract as written: Wile v. Cook, 1986 CanLII 27 (SCC), [1986] 2 S.C.R. 137; 69 N.R. 67. At the Appeal Division level the Chief Justice talks about the defaulting party having “refused ever to complete the agreement as written and was unilaterally dictating different terms”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.