I find no special reason here for costs of this motion not to follow the general rule set out in Rule 57.03(1)(a). For the reasons identified by the appellant, there are good policy reasons behind this rule. And as also noted by the appellant and referred to in other cases from this court (see: McKenna v. McKenna, [2002] P.E.I.J. No. 70, 2002 PESCTD 50), the general rule is that costs are payable to the successful party by the unsuccessful party.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.