As stated by Mason J. in Scott v. Mohan, [1993] A.J. No. 592 (Q.B.)(QL); (1993), 142 A.R. 281: ¶55 In the event a definitive diagnosis is not achieved, the doctor is required during the working diagnosis step to monitor the results of the treatment prescribed for the symptoms and complaints identified and to continue development of a history by clinical tests and examinations to determine if a definitive diagnosis can be obtained or return to the first step of differential diagnosis. Where treatment, ongoing history, clinical examination and tests do not support the working diagnosis there is a duty to reconsider the matter by further differential diagnosis or consultation and referral.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.