What is the test for interpretation of 5.1(1)(c) of the BC Workers’ Compensation Act?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from A1702544 (Re), 2018 CanLII 135069 (BC WCAT):

I also note that the recent decision[2] of Bendera v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal 2018 BCSC 552 expressed caution must be exercised in the statutory interpretation of 5.1(1)(c) to avoid interpretation of the statute leading to an absurd result.

Other Questions


Does s. 10 of The Workers' Compensation Act, as amended in 1974, bar an action under section 10 of the workers' compensation act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What constitutes bullying and harassment under section 135(1)(c) of the BC Workers’ Compensation Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for a workplace injury to be a compensable one in workers’ compensation law? (British Columbia, Canada)
When is a community health worker entitled to workers’ compensation for travel time? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is cognitive impairment secondary to a compensable injury sufficient to meet the requirements of the BC Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal of BC? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for compensability under section 5.1(b) of the Workers’ Compensation Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the standard of review apply to a review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal decision to which the decision was patently unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a pipefitter have to be considered a travelling employee for workers’ compensation purposes? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on workplace injuries under the BC Workers’ Compensation Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the BC government's policy of not funding interpretation services for deaf patients been interpreted in conjunction with receipt of medical care? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.