46. Most nuisance cases address noise, water, vibration or odour rather than visual appearance. This is because these items physically travel onto adjacent properties. Courts have not generally found liability for “visual nuisance” because it is non-intrusive and does not travel physically, unless there is glare off a reflective surface. Blocking or changing a view - even a beautiful view - has not been held to be a legal nuisance: Zhang v. Davies, 2017 BCSC 1180, paragraph 83.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.