Insofar as the respondent argues that the sale proceeds held in the lawyer’s trust account is property held by the bankrupt in trust for any other person and therefore not property of the bankrupt divisible among his creditors, I have noted that para. 47 in Bellamy v. Hill, supra seems to reject that characterization.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.