At ¶341 the author goes on to observe: It would seem that in the context of standard form printed documents the rule proposed in Mendelssohn v. Normand Ltd. [(1970), 1 Q.B. 177 (C.A.)] is sound, for one who induces signature to a document by saying something inconsistent with its contents can never be said to have a reasonable expectation of the other party's assent. The former party cannot reasonably suppose that the signer intended the document to prevail over what had just been said. . .
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.