Is this action appropriate for summary trial pursuant to Rule 9‑7?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Maquire v. Zampieri, 2014 BCSC 1937 (CanLII):
In my view, this action is appropriate for summary trial pursuant to Rule 9‑7 and it would be just to decide the case on that basis: 101 West Hastings Residential Limited Partnership v. Jensen, 2012 BCSC 278, at para. 43.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a summary trial judge make a finding that a matter is not suitable for disposition by way of summary trial during the hearing of the summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a summary trial pursuant to Rule 9-7 a true trial of the action? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a summary trial be held on an application for summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the Court consider in deciding whether it would be unjust to find that a summary trial is appropriate to consider the issues before deciding whether to proceed with a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a single issue is proposed for summary trial by way of summary trial, does the court have any consideration in deciding the issue as a whole? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where a summary trial is not appropriate for a full trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a summary trial on a motion of summary judgment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is this action suitable for determination by summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the courts consider in deciding whether to grant summary trial rather than a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence an action against a defendant in the same action against the same defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
