Is this action suitable for determination by summary trial?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Ohman v. Synq Access + Security Technology Limited, 2018 BCSC 1078 (CanLII):
The plaintiff submits this action is suitable for determination by summary trial in that the essential facts to prove in order to prove the debt, ie. the advance of funds by the plaintiff to the defendant, the execution of a promissory note evidencing the debt and the demand by the plaintiff for payment are all either admitted or not denied by the defendant: see Charest v. Poch, 2011 BCSC 1165.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a summary trial judge make a finding that a matter is not suitable for disposition by way of summary trial during the hearing of the summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a summary trial be held on an application for summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test to determine suitability for a summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a summary trial pursuant to Rule 9-7 a true trial of the action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is this application suitable for determination by summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a single issue is proposed for summary trial by way of summary trial, does the court have any consideration in deciding the issue as a whole? (British Columbia, Canada)
When an offer is made by a defendant for a pre-trial settlement is reasonably refused, is the fact that the entire action is ultimately dismissed in its entirety a factor in determining double costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the Court consider in deciding whether it would be unjust to find that a summary trial is appropriate to consider the issues before deciding whether to proceed with a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the scope of appellate review of a finding that a judge err in proceeding to determine the substantive issue by way of summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the relevant factors for determining whether either of two possible jurisdictions would be suitable for the determination of issues raised by the litigation at issue? (British Columbia, Canada)
