It is noted however at para. 10 that an award for such services is “not automatic” and that “[en]titlement for an award for such fees is a question of fact to be resolved based on the evidence in every case”: Mandzuk v. I.C.B.C., 1988 CanLII 16 (SCC), [1988] 2 S.C.R. 650 at 651. The court notes that a plaintiff is to provide a factual basis including: (a) evidence that management assistance is in fact necessary; (b) evidence that investment advice is in fact necessary in the circumstances; and (c) evidence as to the cost of such services.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.