KW is, in any event, entitled to partial indemnity costs in respect of the Winding-up Application, by virtue of his success, up to January 14, 2010 and to substantial indemnity costs thereafter. In respect of the period after the Winding-up Application was commenced and before January 14, 2010, this, in my view, is a case where, as in Young v. Young, partial (as opposed to full) substantial indemnity costs are appropriate because of the tax fraud allegations reiterated by AJ during the course of the Winding-up Application and the other conduct I have identified as reprehensible, which occurred after the Winding-up Application was commenced.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.