Can a participant file a further submission responding to new issues raised in a reply submission?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from L v. B.C. (Ministry of Children and Family Development), 2011 BCHRT 214 (CanLII):
Rule 24(7) provides that a participant may be permitted to file a further submission responding to new issues raised in a reply submission: Kruger v. Xerox Canada (No. 2), 2005 BCHRT 24, para. 17. In some circumstances, fairness may require an opportunity for further submissions: Kruger, para. 17.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a respondent respond to an application with a sur-reply responding to new issues raised in reply? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the scope of an application to file further submissions to address a new issue raised in a reply submission? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is Sur-reply permitted where a new issue or evidence has been raised in a reply? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for responding to a reply submission? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Respondent Respondent responded to an application for a change in parenting time? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the relevant factors for determining whether either of two possible jurisdictions would be suitable for the determination of issues raised by the litigation at issue? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the issues costs for a party who is substantially successful on a discrete issue or issue? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a common issue or issue be tried in advance of individual issues? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that the respondent did not expect the respondent to pay for the domestic services provided by the Respondent have any impact on an unjust enrichment claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party to a medical malpractice action be required to give an expert opinion on matters directly connected with the issues raised at trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
