The law with respect to the scope of intervention of an appeal court into orders with respect to custody and child support following divorce is clear. It was recently affirmed in Willick v. Willick, 1994 CanLII 28 (SCC), [1994] 3 S.C.R. 670; 173 N.R. 321; 125 Sask.R. 81; 81 W.A.C. 81, in the context of an application to vary child support. The trial judge’s exercise of discretion ought not be disturbed in the absence of material error which would include significant misapprehension of evidence or acting on a wrong principle. We have not been convinced that such has occurred here.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.