Does a plaintiff have a legally tenable claim against the proposed defendants?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Zimmerman v. McNaull, 2021 ONSC 3436 (CanLII):

In this case, whether the plaintiffs have a legally tenable claim against the proposed defendants depends on whether their claim was commenced within the applicable limitation period. The “clear expiration of a limitation period is an absolute bar to the addition of a party to an already existing action”. See Arcari v. Dawson, 2016 ONCA 715 at para. 7, leave to appeal to SCC refused, [2016] S.C.C.A. No. 522.

Other Questions


Does a plaintiff have a legally tenable claim against the proposed defendant? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for determining whether a plaintiff has been successful in a personal injury claim? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for adding a defendant to a claim where the limitation period has not yet expired? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a defendant entitled to enriched costs over and over indemnity fees if there is no reasonable offer to settle a plaintiff's claim by payment of some amount? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal tenability of a motion to amend a statement of claim? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a motion for a stay of execution pending a counter-claim, cross-claim and third party claim valid? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a substantial indemnity claim in a personal injury action brought by a Defendant against a Plaintiff? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to succeed in her claim against a defendant? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a plaintiff's new statement of claim that describes the nature of their employment contract relevant to a whistleblowing claim? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a plaintiff continue to serve a jury notice to amend their claim once leave is granted to amend the claim? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.