California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Verkade, D064499 (Cal. App. 2015):
When such documents are subpoenaed, as in the present case, an in camera hearing may be required to determine whether the defendant's need for the information outweighs the third-party's interest in confidentiality. (Pennsylvania v. Ritchie (1987) 480 U.S. 39, 60 [state statute providing for confidentiality of investigative files concerning child abuse]; see Pen. Code, 1326, subd. (c) ["court may order an in camera hearing to determine whether or not the defense is entitled to receive the documents"].) Hammon is quite clear, however. This in camera review is to occur, if at all, at trial not during pretrial proceedings:
Page 25
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.