California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Clark, C080295 (Cal. App. 2020):
As a preliminary matter, on this record, it cannot be said "there simply could be no satisfactory explanation" for defense counsel to avoid requesting this instruction. (People v. Burgener, supra, 29 Cal.4th at p. 880.) As the People aptly argue, defense counsel may have believed that adding these instructions on top of a mental impairment instruction would have resulted in "muddying the waters." Defense counsel chose to base his case primarily on the theory that defendant did not use force or fear in committing the alleged crimes. Defense counsel might have felt that drawing too much
Page 16
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.