When will a defendant's objection to testimony at trial be considered on appeal?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Clark, 10 Cal.Rptr.2d 554, 3 Cal.4th 41, 833 P.2d 561 (Cal. 1992):

Defendant did not object to this testimony on the ground of Evidence Code sections 352 and 1101. In the absence of a timely and specific [3 Cal.4th 126] objection on the ground sought to be urged on appeal, the trial court's rulings on admissibility of evidence will not be reviewed. (Evid.Code, 353; People v. Green (1980) 27 Cal.3d 1, 22, fn. 8, 164 Cal.Rptr. 1, 609 P.2d 468.) Accordingly, these contentions are not preserved for appeal.

Other Questions


Is a defendant's failure to object on appeal cognizable because the issue is not cognizable on appeal because trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to object? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant waive their right to object on appeal to a plaintiff's trial misconduct by failing to request the trial court to admonish the jury to disregard such misconduct? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's failure to make a timely and specific objection to a motion on the grounds that he now raises an objection on appeal forfeits his claim on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Is a witness who gives evidence at a joint trial considered a witness against a defendant if the jury is instructed to consider that testimony only against a codefendant? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant permitted to proceed with an application to appeal against the finding that he failed to object at trial to the Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
Is a witness who gives evidence at a joint trial considered a witness against a defendant if the jury is instructed to consider that testimony only against a codefendant? (California, United States of America)
Is a witness who gives evidence at a joint trial considered a witness against a defendant if the jury is instructed to consider that testimony only against a codefendant? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
When will a jury consider the credibility of a defendant's extrajudicial statements against trial testimony and the physical evidence and testimony of witnesses? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant's request to represent himself at a jury trial need to be considered to have been considered prior to trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.