The following excerpt is from United States v. Churchill, 18-2923-cr (2nd Cir. 2019):
When an appellant challenges a district court's ruling on a motion to suppress evidence, we review the district court's findings of fact for clear error and questions of law or mixed questions of law and factincluding whether an officer had reasonable suspicion to extend a traffic stopde novo. United States v. Santillan, 902 F.3d 49, 56 (2d Cir. 2018).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.