California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Moran v. Oso Valley Greenbelt Ass'n, 111 Cal.Rptr.2d 636, 92 Cal.App 4th 156 (Cal. App. 2001):
Thus, the trial court has discretion to award attorney fees and costs. We will not disturb the trial court's decision absent an abuse of that discretion. (See Adoption of D.S.C. (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 14, 24-25, 155 Cal.Rptr. 406.) The trial court's discretion, however, is not absolute: "The discretion intended, however, is not a capricious or arbitrary discretion, but an impartial discretion, guided and controlled in its exercise by fixed legal principles. It is not a mental discretion, to be exercised ex gratia, but a legal discretion, to be exercised in conformity with the spirit of the law and in a manner to subserve and not to impede or defeat the ends of substantial justice." (Bailey v. Taaffe (1866) 29 Cal. 422, 424.) An exercise of discretion is subject to reversal on appeal where
[111 Cal.Rptr.2d 639]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.