The following excerpt is from Castro v. Cnty. of L.A., 797 F.3d 654 (9th Cir. 2015):
Once it is established that the defendant's conduct has in fact been one of the causes of the plaintiff's injury, there remains the question whether the defendant should be legally responsible for the injury. Id. at 1100 (quoting White v. Roper, 901 F.2d 1501, 1506 (9th Cir.1990) ). A corrections officer will be held legally responsible for an inmate's injuries if the officer's actions are a moving force behind a series of events that ultimately lead to a foreseeable harm, even if other intervening causes contributed to the harm. Id. at 1101. If reasonable persons could differ over the question of foreseeability, that issue should be left to the jury. Id.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.