The following excerpt is from United States v. Mills, No. 12-3131-cr (2nd Cir. 2013):
When reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, "[w]e will not disturb the conviction if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." United States v. Greer, 631 F.3d 608, 613 (2d Cir. 2011) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. Gaines, 295 F.3d 293, 299-300 (2d Cir. 2002).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.