When determining whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain a conviction on appeal, what is the role of the Court of Appeal?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Sardina, B233143 (Cal. App. 2012):
When determining whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain a conviction, "our role on appeal is a limited one." (People v. Ochoa (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1199, 1206.) "[T]he test of whether evidence is sufficient to support a conviction is 'whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.'
Page 7
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When determining whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain a conviction on appeal, what is the role of the Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, what is the standard of review required by the California Court of Appeal to determine whether the evidence is sufficient? (California, United States of America)
When determining whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain a criminal conviction, what is the test for the evidence? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court consider the sufficiency of evidence in determining whether the evidence was sufficient to prevent or dissuade a victim or witness from reporting a crime? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its factual determination for that factual determination? (California, United States of America)
When determining whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain a criminal conviction, how does the court review the entire record? (California, United States of America)
When determining whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain a criminal conviction, what is the test for reversal of a conviction? (California, United States of America)
What role does the Court of Appeal have in determining the sufficiency of the evidence in the context of an appeal? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court consider whether there is sufficient evidence to support a motion to dismiss an application for relief from the Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in determining whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain a conviction or support the denial of a section 1118.1 motion? (California, United States of America)
