California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Quick v. Woman's Club of Hollywood, B233530 (Cal. App. 2012):
proceeding has been so assigned. . . . If such were not the law, conflicting adjudications of the same subject-matter by different department of the one court would bring about an anomalous situation and doubtless lead to much confusion."' [Citations.]" (Id. at pp. 1449-1450, italics added.) It is clear from a complete reading that O'Flaherty v. Belgum does not stand for the proposition cited by defendants and that jurisdiction to appoint a receiver is not vested in a particular department.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.