The following excerpt is from United States v. Kent, 821 F.3d 362 (2nd Cir. 2016):
We review a sentence for both procedural and substantive reasonableness. United States v. Cavera, 550 F.3d 180, 189 (2d Cir.2008) (en banc). When a district court makes a mistake in its Guidelines calculation, this constitutes a procedural error. Id. at 190. If we identify procedural error in a sentence, but the record indicates clearly that the district court would have imposed the same sentence in any event, the error may be deemed harmless, avoiding the need to vacate the sentence and to remand the
[821 F.3d 368]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.