What role does the Court of Appeal have in determining the sufficiency of evidence in a sexual assault case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Johnson, C082148 (Cal. App. 2017):
"The role of an appellate court in reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence is limited. The court must 'review the whole record in the light most favorable to the judgment below to determine whether it discloses substantial evidence-that is, evidence which is reasonable, credible, and of solid value-such that a reasonable trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.' [Citations.]" (People v. Ceja (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1134, 1138.)
Page 5
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In determining the sufficiency of evidence in a civil case, how have courts considered the evidence in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
What role does the Court of Appeal have in determining the sufficiency of evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What role does the Court of Appeal have in determining the sufficiency of evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What role does the Court of Appeal have in determining the sufficiency of evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
In determining the sufficiency of the evidence in a sexual assault case, what is the test for determining sufficiency? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review used by the Court of Appeal to determine the sufficiency of evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal assess the sufficiency of evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence in the case of the alleged sexual assault of a young girl, how have the courts considered the evidence against the accused? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, how have the courts dealt with claims that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding evidence of the victim's other sexual conduct? (California, United States of America)
