The following excerpt is from United States v. Veon, 538 F. Supp. 237 (E.D. Cal. 1982):
13 This caution appears appropriate since at least one court has apparently confused what must be proved with the degree of persuasion. See United States v. Mandel, 408 F.Supp. at 682-83.
14 The above observation must be no more than hyperbole. As will be seen in section III-D, infra, it may be that the district court in Long had no more than hearsay before it. Although hearsay may bear sufficient indicia of reliability under certain circumstances to support a finding (see Calhoun v. Bailar, 626 F.2d 145 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 906, 101 S.Ct. 3033, 69 L.Ed.2d 407 (1981), I can hardly believe that anybody would be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt by mere hearsay.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.