California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Harris, 37 Cal.Rptr.2d 200, 886 P.2d 1193, 9 Cal.4th 407 (Cal. 1994):
[9 Cal.4th 439] "It is self-evident, we think, that the [Fourteenth] Amendment requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt and the Sixth Amendment requirement of a jury verdict are interrelated. It would not satisfy the Sixth Amendment to have a jury determine that the defendant is probably guilty, and then leave it up to the judge to determine ... whether he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. In other words, the jury verdict required by the Sixth Amendment is a jury verdict of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.... [A]n instruction [misdefining proof beyond a reasonable doubt by effectively lowering its threshold] ... does not produce such a verdict." (Sullivan v. Louisiana, supra, 508 U.S. at pp. ---- - ----, 113 S.Ct. at pp. 2080-2081, italics in original, fn. omitted.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.