At trial, the Plaintiff initially sought the return of all of the money that she invested in the property. As noted in Kerr v. Baranow, supra, at ¶ 101: ….. Of course, a claimant cannot expect both to get back something given to the defendant and retain something received from him or her: Birks, at p.415. The unjust enrichment analysis must take account of this common sense proposition…..
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.