What is the test for the proposition that a prosecutor violates the constitution by commenting on a defendant's right to retain counsel?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Strawther, C075902 (Cal. App. 2017):

Defendant also cites United States v. Kallin (9th Cir. 1995) 50 F.3d 689, 693, for the proposition that "a prosecutor violates the constitution by commenting on a defendant's decision to exercise his right to retain counsel." That case is also inapposite; here the prosecutor did not comment on defendant's decision to retain counsel.

Defendant next points out that the right to receive and examine discovery from the prosecution is rooted in the Fourteenth Amendment right to due process, citing Brady v.

Page 5

Other Questions


What is the test for finding that a prosecutor's comments about the lack of subpoena violated a defendant's federal constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a defendant's absolute right to counsel and his unqualified constitutional right to discharge counsel if he pleases and represents himself? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue on appeal that counsel's inaction at trial to alleged prosecutorial misconduct violated their constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue on appeal that counsel's inaction at trial to alleged prosecutorial misconduct violated his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who failed to object at trial to alleged prosecutorial misconduct on appeal argue that counsel's inaction violated their constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor's comments about sexual assault violate a defendant's federal and state constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue that counsel's failure to object to the prosecutor's argument violated his right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue on appeal that counsel's inaction at trial to alleged prosecutorial misconduct violated their constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.