What is the test for sufficiency of evidence in a motion to overturn a finding that the evidence was inadequate?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from McCafrey v. Preston, 154 Cal.App.3d 422, 201 Cal.Rptr. 252 (Cal. App. 1984):
In resolving the issue of sufficiency of the evidence, we are bound by the established rules of appellate review that all factual matters will be viewed most favorably to the prevailing party and to the judgment (Nestle v. City of Santa Monica, 6 Cal.3d 920, 925, 101 Cal.Rptr. 568, 496 P.2d 480).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is sufficient evidence to have been sufficient evidence for a jury to find that defendant intentionally poisoned a patient? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of the proponent of evidence in a motion to overturn a finding that excluded evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is there sufficient evidence to support the jury's finding that there was sufficient evidence for a reversal of judgment? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to overturn a finding of insufficient sufficiency of evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What constitutes substantial evidence in a motion to overturn a finding of not guilty? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, what is the test for reversal of a finding of insufficient evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for finding substantial evidence to support a motion for a new trial motion based on juror misconduct? (California, United States of America)
Is substantial evidence sufficient to overturn a motion for a new trial? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for summary adjudication on a motion to exclude evidence as to drainage, does plaintiff need to explain to the arbitrator why it was necessary to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)
