The following excerpt is from Jamison v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 2:16-cv-00422-KJM-AC (E.D. Cal. 2017):
To establish standing, (1) the plaintiff must have suffered an "injury-in-fact," (2) there must be a "causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of," and (3) it must be likely that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision. Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992). To find an "injury in fact," the plaintiff must demonstrate "an invasion of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized . . . and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical." Id. at 560 (internal citations and quotation marks omitted).
A Rule 12(b)(1) jurisdictional attack on standing grounds may be facial or factual. Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer, 373 F.3d 1035, 1039 (9th Cir. 2004) (citing White v. Lee, 227 F.3d 1214, 1242 (9th Cir. 2000)). In a facial attack, the challenger asserts the allegations contained in a complaint are insufficient on their face to invoke federal jurisdiction. Id. In a
Page 5
factual attack, the challenger disputes the truth of the allegations that, by themselves, would otherwise invoke federal jurisdiction. Id.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.