California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Lawson, 189 Cal.App.3d 741, 234 Cal.Rptr. 557 (Cal. App. 1987):
The instructional error here amounted to prohibited factfinding by the court and thus requires reversal. As the United States court explained in Cabana v. Bullock (1986) 474 U.S. 376, ----, 106 S.Ct. 689, 696, 88 L.Ed.2d 704: "Findings made by a judge cannot cure deficiencies in the jury's finding as to the guilt or innocence of a defendant resulting from the court's failure to instruct it to find an element of the crime."
Recently, in People v. Rodriguez (1986) 42 Cal.3d 1005, 1010, 232 Cal.Rptr. 132, 728 P.2d 202, our high court reminded us the "[a]pplication of the per se standard requiring
Page 565
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.