What is the test for relying on the statute of limitations in a challenge to a city's adoption of a general plan?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Bridges v. City of Wildomar, E063986 (Cal. App. 2017):
We also reject plaintiffs' reliance on City of Coachella v. Riverside County Airport Land Use Com. (1989) 210 Cal.App.3d 1277 and Travis v. County of Santa Cruz (2004) 33 Cal.4th 757. Neither case involves the application of the statute of limitations in a challenge to a city's adoption of a general plan. The inescapable conclusion is that this lawsuit is a challenge to the procedure the City used to adopt its General Plan. Because
Page 10
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any case law where the statute of limitations has been applied in a challenge to a city's adoption of a general plan? (California, United States of America)
When harmonizing two statutes relating to the same subject, can a particular or specific statute take precedence over a conflicting general statute? (California, United States of America)
Does section 360.5 of the California Statute of limitations bar a plaintiff from bringing a claim against the statute of limitations? (California, United States of America)
Does the statute of limitations applicable to this cause of action, the Government Tort Claims Act, preclude a plaintiff from bringing an action against a governmental entity within the applicable statute of limitation? (California, United States of America)
Is the city attorney's authority limited to the limits of the authority of the city charter? (California, United States of America)
What is the statute of limitations for a challenge to a local planning decision? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for estopped to rely upon laches or the statute of limitations? (California, United States of America)
If a statutory language does not yield a plain meaning, and the legislative history of the legislation is not to be considered in determining the meaning of the statute, can a court rely on the statute itself? (California, United States of America)
Does the statute of limitations bar an action to challenge an assessment which is illegal or void? (California, United States of America)
Is a limitation on counsel's general voir dire limited preventing the defense from eliciting juror bias? (California, United States of America)
