The following excerpt is from Hotop v. City of San Jose, 982 F.3d 710 (9th Cir. 2020):
Majority Opinion at 714. First asking, as the majority does here, whether plaintiffs can show that they possess a reasonable expectation of privacy in the disclosed information puts the cart before the horse in a manner untethered from the language of the Fourth Amendment. See Entick v. Carrington , 19 How. St. Tr. 1029, 1066, 95 Eng. Rep. 807 (1765) ("[T]he eye cannot by the laws of England be guilty of a trespass, yet where private papers are removed and carried away, the secret nature of those goods will be an aggravation of the trespass."). What first determines whether government action that obtains information implicates the Fourth Amendment is not the nature of the information requested; it is the method and manner of the collection.5 Cf.
[982 F.3d 723]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.