The following excerpt is from Hamilton v. Chater, 106 F.3d 407 (9th Cir. 1997):
We review a district court's order upholding the Commissioner's denial of benefits de novo. Smolen v. Chater, 80 F.3d 1273, 1279 (9th Cir.1996). The scope of our review, however, is limited: we must affirm the Commissioner's decision if substantial evidence supports that decision and the Commissioner applied the correct legal standards. Id. After a thorough examination of the record and the briefs, we affirm the decision of the district court.
Opinion of Claimant's Treating Physicians
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.