California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Haulcy, D072701 (Cal. App. 2018):
In Schmerber, supra, 384 U.S. 757, 770, the court recognized that the natural dissipation of alcohol in a person's blood could be an exigent circumstance requiring taking blood without consent or a warrant. The court accepted that alcohol in a person's blood stream disappears at a fairly predictable rate after drinking. Thus, delays in obtaining blood samples may result in lost evidence which is relevant to whether the person was under the influence of alcohol while driving. (People v. Thompson (2008) 38 Cal.4th 811, 825.)
In order to determine if police acted reasonably in relying on exigent circumstances we must look to the totality of the circumstances. (Ohio v. Robinette (1996) 519 U.S. 33, 39.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.