California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Hernandez v. W.R. Thomas, Inc., D064036 (Cal. App. 2015):
Plaintiffs also failed to meet their burden to show the exemption of small claims disputes is unduly harsh or unfairly one-sided. On its face and in practical application, the provision is mutual. (See Arguelles-Romero v. Superior Court (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 825, 845, fn. 21.) Vehicle purchasers frequently have small claims disputes with sellersfor example, for the cost to repair a defective condition of the vehicleand it would not be unfair that this dispute would be exempt from arbitration. Consumers benefit from this exception by having a faster and much less expensive dispute resolution forum to resolve claims under a certain monetary amount without needing to retain an attorney. The fact that injunctive or other forms of equitable relief are not available in
Page 31
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.