What is the test for instructing a jury on an uncharged offense that is less serious than a charged greater offense?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Amezcua, F064904 (Cal. App. 2014):

"A criminal defendant has a constitutional right to have the jury determine every material issue presented by the evidence, and an erroneous failure to instruct on a lesser included offense constitutes a denial of that right. To protect this right and the broader interest of safeguarding the jury's function of ascertaining the truth, a trial court must instruct on an uncharged offense that is less serious than, and included in, a charged greater offense, even in the absence of a request, whenever there is substantial evidence raising a question as to whether all of the elements of the charged greater offense are present." (People v. Huggins (2006) 38 Cal.4th 175, 215.) "This venerable instructional rule ensures that the jury may consider all supportable crimes necessarily included within the charge itself, thus encouraging the most accurate verdict permitted by the pleadings and the evidence." (People v. Birks (1998) 19 Cal.4th 108, 112.)

Other Questions


If a defendant is convicted of a lesser charge of a greater charge of sexual assault, is the lesser charge necessarily included in the greater charge? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that was assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for applying the independent or de novo standard of review to a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that is assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant plead guilty or no contest to an uncharged offense or an offense that is not necessarily included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that was assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
Is a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that is assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a lesser charged offence is necessarily included in a greater charged offense? (California, United States of America)
What is the duty of a court to instruct a jury on any uncharged lesser offense that is necessarily included in a charged offence? (California, United States of America)
What if the trial court had instructed on the lesser misdemeanor charge rather than the greater charge? (California, United States of America)
Is an uncharged offense necessarily included within a charged offense? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.