What is the test for imposing a disproportionate sentence on a convicted rapist?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Miller, B219922, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. MA041498 (Cal. App. 2011):

"Article I, section 17 of the California Constitution prohibits infliction of '[c]ruel or unusual punishment.' A sentence may violate this prohibition if ' "it is so disproportionate to the crime for which it is inflicted that it shocks the conscience and offends fundamental notions of human dignity." ' [Citation.] [] . . . Defendant must overcome a 'considerable burden' to show the sentence is disproportionate to his level of culpability. [Citation.] Therefore, '[f]indings of disproportionality have occurred with exquisite rarity in the case law.' [Citation.]" (People v. Em (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 964, 972 (Em), citations omitted.)

Other Questions


When a court gives both proper and improper reasons for imposing a sentence for a convicted rapist, what are the consequences of the sentence? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law in which a defendant has argued that a sentence imposed by a court was wrong when it imposed a prison term on a convicted rapist? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to impose a fine of up to $1,000 on a convicted rapist who is convicted of a life sentence without parole? (California, United States of America)
Does a convicted felon who has completed his sentence for a conviction for a felonies conviction under Proposition 47 of the California Criminal Code, who would have been convicted of a misdemeanor under this act if this act had not been in effect? (California, United States of America)
Does a mid term sentence need to be imposed on a convicted drug dealer who was convicted of a series of drug crimes because of premeditation? (California, United States of America)
In a federal civil case, in what circumstances will the sentence of a convicted rapist be considered grossly disproportionate? (California, United States of America)
Can a convicted felon who has completed his sentence for a conviction for a crime committed under Proposition 47, who would have been guilty of a misdemeanor under the same legislation, apply to have the conviction reduced to a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
Is a federal sentencing scheme that allows a federal judge to impose a sentence above the statutory maximum based on a fact other than a prior conviction? (California, United States of America)
Does the court erred in imposing a life sentence with a determinate sentence for each serious felony conviction found to be true in this case? (California, United States of America)
Is the sentence imposed on an appellant who was convicted of assault with intent to cause grievous bodily harm disproportionate? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.