The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Bess, 104 F.3d 352 (2nd Cir. 1996):
In reviewing the district court's determination as to the admissibility of identification evidence, we adhere to a clearly erroneous standard. See United States v. Mohammed, 27 F.3d 815, 821 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 451 (1994); United States v. Jakobetz, 955 F.2d 786, 803 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 506 U.S. 834 (1992). In this case, there was no clear error.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.